Week 04
February 24, 2025
At the level of the entire economy, there are two sides in the market for Goods & Services (G&S):
The total amount of planned expenditures on G&S, which we will call \((D)\), is given by: 1 \[D=C+I+G+NX \tag{1}\]
In a developed market economy, personal consumption expenditures \(C\) are explained by three fundamental variables:1 \[ C=\overline{C}+c \cdot \underbrace{(Y-T)}_{=Y_D}-b \cdot r \tag{2} \]
Therefore, the demand expenditures on investment G&S will be given by: \[I=\overline{I}-d \cdot(r+\overline{f}) \tag{4}\]
In the great financial crisis of 2007-2010, the inverse relationship between \((\overline{f})\) and \(I\) can be easily spotted in the figure below: \(\uparrow \overline{f}, \downarrow I\), despite \((i)\) going down. And \(\downarrow \overline{f}, \uparrow I\), despite \(i\) remaining at \(0 \%\).
The level of income taxes \((T)\) increases with income, so we could describe taxes with the following tax function: \[ T=\overline{T}+t \cdot Y \tag{6} \] where \(t\) is the marginal income tax rate.
However, for simplicity, we will assume that the level of income taxes is also exogenously determined: \[ T=\overline{T} \tag{7} \]
This simplification will not significantly change our results in this course.
Net-exports expenditures are made up of two components:
Autonomous net exports \((\overline{N X})\)
Net exports affected by changes in real interest rates \((r)\)
Putting together these two components, we get: \[ N X=\overline{N X}-x \cdot r \tag{8} \] where \(x>0\) is a parameter.
Why are net exports negatively dependent on the real interest rate?
See next slide.
An example. Suppose the ECB (European Central Bank) lowers interest rates in the EuroZone: \[ \downarrow r_{_{(ZE)}} \]
From eq. (1), we saw that the level of aggregate demand is given by:
\[D=C+I+G+NX\]
And from week 2, we know that GDP \((Y)\) can be calculated by the sum of all expenditures on final G&S. So we must have:
\[Y=D \tag{9}\]
Therefore, we can relate GDP with the demand side by writing:
\[Y=C+I+G+NX \tag{10}\]
Eq. (10) allows us to obtain a very simple and useful curve: IS curve
To obtain an equation that reflects the impact of demand forces on the level of GDP \((Y)\), we have to do as follows:
\[Y=C+I+G+NX\]
\[ Y=\underbrace{\overline{C}+c \cdot(Y-\overline{T})-b \cdot r}_{=C}+\underbrace{\overline{I}-d \cdot(r+\overline{f})}_{=I}+\underbrace{\overline{G}}_{=G}+\underbrace{\overline{NX}-x \cdot r}_{=NX} \]
Rearranging better the previous equation, we get:
\[ Y=\overline{C}+\overline{I}-d \cdot \overline{f}+\overline{G}+\overline{N X}-c \cdot \overline{T}+c \cdot Y-(b+d+x) \cdot r \tag{11} \]
Smplify the exposition, by grouping together all the elements with an over bar, and call it the Exogenous/Autonomous Aggregate Demand:
\[ \overline{A}=\overline{C}+\overline{I}-d \cdot \overline{f}+\overline{G}+\overline{N X}-c \cdot \overline{T} \tag{12} \]
Inserting eq. (12) into eq. (11), we get a very simple equation: \[ Y=\overline{A}+c \cdot Y-(b+d+x) \cdot r \]
which can be solved for \(Y\) as follows:
\[ Y=\frac{1}{1-c} \cdot \overline{A}-\frac{(b+d+x)}{1-c} \cdot r \tag{13} \]
But we can simplify it even further:
\[ Y=m \cdot \overline{A}-m \cdot \phi \cdot r \tag{14} \]
Definition: IS curve
For a given set of parameters \(\{m,\phi\}\), the level of Aggregate Demand and GDP \((D, Y)\) is positively affected by the level of the autonomous/exogenous aggregate demand \((\overline{A})\), and negatively by the level of the real interest rate \((r)\) : \[ Y=m \cdot \overline{A}-m \cdot \phi \cdot r \tag{14'} \]
For a given level of \((\overline{A})\), an increase in \((r)\) will cause a reduction in aggregate demand \((D)\), which will lead to a decline in GDP \((Y)\), and vice-versa.
Recall that the exogenous/autonomous aggregate demand is given by:1 \[ \overline{A}=\overline{C}+\overline{I}-d \cdot \overline{f}+\overline{G}+\overline{N X}-c \cdot \overline{T} \]
A change in any of these components of \(\overline{A}\) will force the IS curve to shift.
For example, consider an increase in public spending: \(\Delta \overline{G}>0\). From the expression above we get:
\[\Delta \overline{A}=\Delta \overline{G}>0\]
However, from the IS curve we know that: \[ \Delta Y=m \cdot \Delta \overline{A} \quad \Longrightarrow \quad \Delta Y=m \cdot \Delta \overline{A} \]
Because \(m>1\), we have: \(\uparrow \overline{G} \Rightarrow \uparrow \overline{A} \Rightarrow \uparrow Y\) : the IS curve shifts to the right
The exogenous aggregate demand:\(\ \ \overline{A}=\overline{C}+\overline{I}-d \cdot \overline{f}+\overline{G}+\overline{N X}-c \cdot \overline{T}\)
A change in the spread (or as the textbook calls it: the “financial friction”) will also shift the IS curve. Suppose that the spread increases by \(4\) percentage points: \[\Delta \overline{f}=+4pp\]
From the exogenous aggregate demand expression above we get:
\[\Delta \overline{A}= - d \cdot \Delta \overline{f}= - d \times 4pp\]
However, from the IS curve we know that: \[ \Delta Y=m \cdot \Delta \overline{A} \quad \Longrightarrow \ \Delta Y= m \cdot ( -d \times 4pp) \]
Because \(m>1, d>0\), we have: \(\uparrow \overline{f} \Rightarrow \downarrow \overline{A} \Rightarrow \downarrow Y\) : the IS curve shifts to the right
An increase in \(\ \overline{G} \ \Rightarrow \ \uparrow \ \overline{A} \ \Rightarrow \ \uparrow Y\) : the IS shifts to the right:
An increase in \(\ \overline{T} \ \Rightarrow \ \downarrow \ \overline{A} \ \Rightarrow \ \downarrow Y\) : the IS shifts to the left:
An increase/decrease in \(\overline{A}\), will shift the IS curve leading to an increase/decline in aggregate demand and GDP. But by how much?
It will depend upon the value of the multiplier \(m\) and the value of the shock.
As \(0<c<1\), then \[ m=\frac{1}{1-c}>1 \quad \Rightarrow \quad \Delta Y= m \cdot \Delta \overline{A} \quad \Rightarrow \quad \Delta Y > \Delta \overline{A} \]
Where \(\overline{A}=\overline{C}+\overline{I}-d \cdot \overline{f}+\overline{G}+\overline{N X}-c \cdot \overline{T}\)
One shock upon \(\overline{A}\) is amplified/multiplied through the other components of expenditure: the higher \(c\) is, the higher will be \(m\).
Read Chapter 9 of the adopted textbook:
Frederic S. Mishkin (2015). Macroeconomics: Policy & Practice, Second Edition, Pearson Editors